Product Liability Attorney

Consumer Expectation Test vs. Risk Benefit Test: Proving A Design Defect In Product Liability Cases

Under California product liability law, if you have been injured by a defective product, it may be for any of the three reasons: the product has a manufacturing defect, the product has a design defect, or the manufacturer failed to provide an adequate warning or instruction to warn of the danger. Even if the product […]

Consumer Expectation Test vs. Risk Benefit Test: Proving A Design Defect In Product Liability Cases Read More »

The Price We Pay for Convenience: Overheating Instant Pot Causes Alarm Among Consumers

For the past several decades, many kitchen and household gadgets have been invented and put on the market. While some of these products could be described as “faddish” at best, other have become common pathways to daily convenience and household staples many people feel they couldn’t live without. From slow cookers to fat-defying grills, technological

The Price We Pay for Convenience: Overheating Instant Pot Causes Alarm Among Consumers Read More »

When Warning Is NOT Necessary, And Your Product Liability Claim Will Be Denied

The first thing every person who has been injured by a defective product does is check the warning labels and instructions to see if what just happened was something the manufacturer of the product warned about. And when the injured person sees no mention of the defect or danger, they think they are about to

When Warning Is NOT Necessary, And Your Product Liability Claim Will Be Denied Read More »

Skip to content