CALIFORNIA LEGAL CODE

California Civil Code § 1714

The General Duty of Care (Negligence)

PUBLISHED · UPDATED

Under California Civil Code § 1714, everyone is responsible for injuries caused to another by their want of ordinary care. This is the foundation of California negligence law — the general duty to use reasonable care to avoid harming others.

Reviewed against the current statutory text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. This page is legal information, not legal advice.

Exact Statute Text

1714. (a) Everyone is responsible, not only for the result of his or her willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned to another by his or her want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his or her property or person, except so far as the latter has, willfully or by want of ordinary care, brought the injury upon himself or herself… The extent of liability in these cases is defined by the Title on Compensatory Relief.

Read the full, current section at the official source: Cal. Civ. Code § 1714 (leginfo).

In Plain English

  • General duty of care: people must use ordinary care to avoid injuring others — the basis of nearly every negligence claim.
  • Comparative fault built in: recovery is reduced to the extent the injured person’s own lack of care contributed to the harm.
  • Applies broadly — car crashes, premises hazards, and most accidental injuries.
  • Damages are measured under California’s compensatory-relief rules (see Civil Code § 3333).

Key Terms Defined

Ordinary care

The care a reasonably careful person would use under the same circumstances.

Negligence

Failing to use ordinary care, causing injury to another — the core theory of most injury claims.

Comparative fault

The reduction of a plaintiff’s recovery by their own percentage of responsibility for the harm.

Purpose & Context

Section 1714 codifies the general duty of care that anchors California tort law. It establishes that people are accountable for the foreseeable harm their carelessness causes — the starting point for proving negligence in an injury case.

Real-World Example

A store leaves a spill unattended and a customer slips and is hurt. Under § 1714, the store may be liable for failing to use ordinary care to keep the premises safe; if the customer was also careless, comparative fault reduces — but does not erase — their recovery.

Civil Code § 1714 at a glance

Civil Code § 1714 at a glance — Source: Cal. Civ. Code § 1714.
ElementWhat it means
DutyUse ordinary care to avoid injuring others
BreachFailing to use that ordinary care
CausationThe breach was a substantial factor in the injury
Comparative faultRecovery reduced by the plaintiff’s own share of fault

Why 1714 Matters

For injured people & families

This is the rule that makes a careless driver, property owner, or business answerable for the harm they cause — the legal foundation of your injury claim. See our California injury lawyer page.

For defendants

Because comparative fault is built into § 1714, the injured party’s own conduct is often a key defense issue affecting the amount owed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the general duty of care in California?

Civil Code § 1714 makes everyone responsible for injuries caused by their want of ordinary care — the basis of negligence claims.

Does my own carelessness affect my claim?

Yes. California uses comparative fault, so your recovery is reduced by your percentage of responsibility, but not eliminated.

What do I have to prove in a negligence case?

Generally duty, breach of ordinary care, causation, and damages.

How are damages measured?

Under California’s compensatory-relief rules, primarily Civil Code § 3333.

Sources & Legal Authorities

Joseph Shirazi, Managing Partner at Compass Law Group

Joseph Shirazi — Managing Partner · California State Bar #265403

Joseph Shirazi is the Managing Partner of Compass Law Group, LLP, representing injury and abuse survivors throughout California.

Verified profiles: Avvo · Super Lawyers · Justia · Elite Lawyer · LinkedIn · CA State Bar

Legally reviewed by Simon Esfandi, Partner & Co-Founder (CA Bar #275307).

Disclaimer: This page provides general legal information about California law and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Do I have a case?

Contact us today for a free consultation.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

California's
Gold Standard
Injury Law Firm

With Joseph Shirazi and Simon Esfandi at the helm, our firm is a trusted name in accident law in California.

Meet Our Managing Partners

Joseph Shirazi
Managing Partner · CA Bar #265403

National Top 100 Trial Lawyers and Avvo 10.0 Superb. Loyola Law School graduate. Recognized for his $14,500,000 truck accident verdict and a $13,000,000 trial verdict.

Read Full Bio →
Simon Esfandi — Managing Partner
Simon Esfandi
Managing Partner · CA Bar #275307

Super Lawyers Rising Star. Southwestern Law School graduate. Led the firm’s $9,870,000 motorcycle accident settlement and a $2,250,000 rideshare recovery.

Read Full Bio →
Firm Recognition
  • ★ National Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • ★ Super Lawyers Rising Star
  • ★ Avvo 10.0 Superb Rating
  • ★ Top 40 Under 40
  • ★ Consumer Attorneys of California · CAALA · AAJ
Total Recovered for Clients
$250,000,000+
$14.5M truck verdict · $13M trial verdict · $9.87M motorcycle · $5M car accident
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique.
Client Rating
★★★★★ 5.0
193+ verified Google reviews · No win, no fee