CALIFORNIA LEGAL CODE
California Civil Code § 1714
The General Duty of Care (Negligence)




Under California Civil Code § 1714, everyone is responsible for injuries caused to another by their want of ordinary care. This is the foundation of California negligence law — the general duty to use reasonable care to avoid harming others.
Reviewed against the current statutory text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. This page is legal information, not legal advice.
Exact Statute Text
1714. (a) Everyone is responsible, not only for the result of his or her willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned to another by his or her want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his or her property or person, except so far as the latter has, willfully or by want of ordinary care, brought the injury upon himself or herself… The extent of liability in these cases is defined by the Title on Compensatory Relief.
Read the full, current section at the official source: Cal. Civ. Code § 1714 (leginfo).
In Plain English
- General duty of care: people must use ordinary care to avoid injuring others — the basis of nearly every negligence claim.
- Comparative fault built in: recovery is reduced to the extent the injured person’s own lack of care contributed to the harm.
- Applies broadly — car crashes, premises hazards, and most accidental injuries.
- Damages are measured under California’s compensatory-relief rules (see Civil Code § 3333).
Key Terms Defined
Ordinary care
The care a reasonably careful person would use under the same circumstances.
Negligence
Failing to use ordinary care, causing injury to another — the core theory of most injury claims.
Comparative fault
The reduction of a plaintiff’s recovery by their own percentage of responsibility for the harm.
Purpose & Context
Section 1714 codifies the general duty of care that anchors California tort law. It establishes that people are accountable for the foreseeable harm their carelessness causes — the starting point for proving negligence in an injury case.
Real-World Example
A store leaves a spill unattended and a customer slips and is hurt. Under § 1714, the store may be liable for failing to use ordinary care to keep the premises safe; if the customer was also careless, comparative fault reduces — but does not erase — their recovery.
Civil Code § 1714 at a glance
| Element | What it means |
|---|---|
| Duty | Use ordinary care to avoid injuring others |
| Breach | Failing to use that ordinary care |
| Causation | The breach was a substantial factor in the injury |
| Comparative fault | Recovery reduced by the plaintiff’s own share of fault |
Related California Statutes
Why 1714 Matters
For injured people & families
This is the rule that makes a careless driver, property owner, or business answerable for the harm they cause — the legal foundation of your injury claim. See our California injury lawyer page.
For defendants
Because comparative fault is built into § 1714, the injured party’s own conduct is often a key defense issue affecting the amount owed.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the general duty of care in California?
Civil Code § 1714 makes everyone responsible for injuries caused by their want of ordinary care — the basis of negligence claims.
Does my own carelessness affect my claim?
Yes. California uses comparative fault, so your recovery is reduced by your percentage of responsibility, but not eliminated.
What do I have to prove in a negligence case?
Generally duty, breach of ordinary care, causation, and damages.
How are damages measured?
Under California’s compensatory-relief rules, primarily Civil Code § 3333.
Sources & Legal Authorities
- California Legislative Information — Official California Codes & Statutes
- Judicial Council of California — Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) — Civil jury instructions, court rules & opinions
- Cornell LII — Wex Legal Encyclopedia — Legal Information Institute (definitions)
- Justia — California Codes & Case Law — California code database & case law

Joseph Shirazi — Managing Partner · California State Bar #265403
Joseph Shirazi is the Managing Partner of Compass Law Group, LLP, representing injury and abuse survivors throughout California.
Verified profiles: Avvo · Super Lawyers · Justia · Elite Lawyer · LinkedIn · CA State Bar
Legally reviewed by Simon Esfandi, Partner & Co-Founder (CA Bar #275307).
Disclaimer: This page provides general legal information about California law and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Injured in Beverly Hills? Our Beverly Hills personal injury lawyer team applies this law to local cases — free, confidential consultation.
Do I have a case?
Contact us today for a free consultation.
California's
Gold Standard
Injury Law Firm
With Joseph Shirazi and Simon Esfandi at the helm, our firm is a trusted name in accident law in California.
Meet Our Managing Partners
National Top 100 Trial Lawyers and Avvo 10.0 Superb. Loyola Law School graduate. Recognized for his $14,500,000 truck accident verdict and a $13,000,000 trial verdict.
Read Full Bio →
Super Lawyers Rising Star. Southwestern Law School graduate. Led the firm’s $9,870,000 motorcycle accident settlement and a $2,250,000 rideshare recovery.
Read Full Bio →- ★ National Top 100 Trial Lawyers
- ★ Super Lawyers Rising Star
- ★ Avvo 10.0 Superb Rating
- ★ Top 40 Under 40
- ★ Consumer Attorneys of California · CAALA · AAJ