Your Battle, Our Compass:
San Francisco Clergy Sexual Abuse Attorney
Our San Francisco sexual abuse attorneys represent survivors who were sexually abused by a priest, pastor, youth minister, deacon, or other religious leader who exploited the spiritual trust and authority of their position. If you or a loved one were abused by clergy or church staff, call us today at (213) 320-1001 for a free, confidential consultation.




Which Religious Institutions and Leaders Are Covered by California Civil Law
California’s civil sexual abuse statutes reach clergy and staff across every denomination and faith tradition, including Catholic priests and deacons, Protestant pastors and youth ministers, rabbis, imams, lay religious educators, and volunteer youth group leaders. The legal theory runs on two parallel tracks: a breach of the institution’s duty of care to protect congregants and children from foreseeable harm, and an intentional tort of battery against the individual abuser, which requires no showing of negligence and supports punitive damages. Under California Civil Code Section 1708.5, any unlawful, offensive, or harmful sexual contact gives rise to a civil battery claim regardless of the abuser’s clerical title or ordination status. A diocese’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing does not extinguish these claims — it typically routes them through a claims administration process that can still result in substantial compensation.
Who Can Be Held Liable for Clergy Sexual Abuse in California?
In California, liability for clergy sexual abuse reaches every person and institution that committed, enabled, or failed to prevent the harm. The individual clergy member bears direct liability for battery and for violating the spiritual and pastoral trust the role carried. Dioceses, parishes, and religious organizations face independent — and often much larger — liability under two overlapping legal theories.
Under respondeat superior, a diocese or religious organization is vicariously liable for abuse that occurs within the scope of a clergy member’s pastoral duties — counseling sessions, youth ministry, religious education, or home visits. Under negligent hiring, supervision, and retention, any diocese or organization that knew or should have known a clergy member posed a danger — including through the well-documented pattern of reassigning known abusers to new parishes without warning congregants — is directly liable under California Civil Code § 1714. A single prior complaint made to a bishop, parish administrator, or diocesan review board is typically sufficient to establish that the institution had, or should have had, constructive knowledge of the risk before the abuse occurred.
- The individual clergy member — the priest, pastor, deacon, or religious leader who committed the abuse
- The diocese, archdiocese, or governing religious body — through respondeat superior and direct negligence in assignment, supervision, and internal reporting
- The individual parish or church — for negligent hiring, retention, or failure to act on prior internal complaints
- Youth ministry and religious education programs — for inadequate screening and supervision of clergy and volunteers working directly with children
- Bishops or administrators who suppressed complaints — individuals who received reports of misconduct and reassigned, rather than removed, the abuser
Frequently Asked Questions: Clergy Sexual Abuse Attorney San Francisco
What is the AB 2777 revival window and how does it affect my San Francisco clergy abuse claim?
AB 2777, codified at California Code of Civil Procedure §340.16, created a revival window allowing adult survivors of sexual assault — including clergy abuse — to file civil claims that were previously time-barred. The window opened January 1, 2023 and closes permanently on December 31, 2026. Survivors who believed their deadline had passed may still have a valid claim if they act before that date.
How does AB 218 apply to childhood clergy sexual abuse in San Francisco?
AB 218, which amended Code of Civil Procedure §340.1, eliminated the statute of limitations entirely for civil claims involving childhood sexual abuse. Because most documented clergy abuse cases involve child victims, this statute applies to the majority of clergy abuse survivors, meaning there is no filing deadline regardless of how long ago the abuse occurred.
Can I still sue if the Archdiocese or diocese involved has filed for bankruptcy?
Yes. A diocesan Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing does not eliminate your right to compensation — it generally routes claims through a court-supervised claims administration process instead of an individual civil trial. Survivors file a proof of claim and can still recover substantial compensation through the resulting settlement trust.
Who can be held liable for clergy sexual abuse beyond the individual priest or pastor?
The diocese, archdiocese, or governing religious body can be held liable under respondeat superior and for negligent hiring, supervision, and retention when it knew or should have known a clergy member posed a danger — including the well-documented pattern of reassigning known abusers to new parishes.
What compensation can I recover in a San Francisco clergy sexual abuse case?
Survivors can recover economic damages including therapy costs, medical expenses, and lost earning capacity, along with non-economic damages for pain, suffering, and emotional distress. California places no cap on non-economic damages in sexual abuse civil cases outside of a bankruptcy claims process.
What evidence should I preserve if I am considering a clergy sexual abuse claim?
Preserve any records connecting you to the parish or program — baptism or confirmation records, photographs, letters, or documentation of your participation in youth ministry or religious education — along with a written account of what you remember, created as soon as it is safe to do so.
Do I need to report the abuse to the diocese before filing a civil lawsuit?
No. Reporting to a diocesan review board or victim assistance coordinator is a separate, optional step that does not affect your right to file a civil claim. Many survivors file a civil claim without ever reporting to the church directly, particularly when the diocese’s own review process is not trusted to be independent.
How long does a San Francisco clergy sexual abuse case typically take?
Timelines vary significantly depending on whether the diocese is in active litigation or a bankruptcy claims process. Standalone civil cases often resolve through settlement within one to two years, while diocesan bankruptcy claims processes can take longer as they resolve claims from potentially hundreds of survivors simultaneously.
How We Value a Clergy Sexual Abuse Case in California
The Archdiocese of San Francisco agreed to pay $395 million in 2026 to resolve clergy abuse claims brought by survivors across the Bay Area, one of the largest Catholic Church abuse settlements in California history. That settlement reflects a fundamental truth about civil cases against religious institutions: when decades of reassignment, cover-up, and institutional silence compound individual wrongdoing, the financial accountability can be profound. At Compass Law Group, our attorneys have recovered more than $250 million for survivors across California, and we bring that same rigorous, evidence-based approach to every clergy sexual abuse case we accept.
Valuing your case begins with a complete accounting of every loss you have suffered — and every loss you will continue to suffer. California law allows survivors to recover compensatory damages covering therapy and ongoing mental health treatment, past and future medical expenses, and lost earnings or diminished earning capacity. Emotional distress and pain and suffering add a separate, uncapped layer of recovery. When a diocese or religious organization knew or should have known about the abuse and failed to act, California Civil Code Section 3294 authorizes punitive damages that can dwarf the underlying compensatory award — though punitive damages are frequently addressed through the claims process in diocesan bankruptcy proceedings rather than a standalone jury verdict.
Under AB 218, survivors of childhood clergy abuse face no statute of limitations. Adult survivors have an additional pathway: the AB 2777 revival window, effective January 1, 2023, remains open only through December 31, 2026.
Compensatory Damages: Calculating the True Cost
Compensatory damages in a California clergy abuse case divide into two categories: economic and non-economic. Economic damages are calculable losses supported by documentary evidence. Non-economic damages reflect harms that resist a simple dollar figure but are fully compensable under California law.
- Past and future therapy costs — Trauma-focused therapy, EMDR, and psychiatric care projected across a survivor’s lifetime by forensic economists.
- Medical expenses — Any treatment required as a direct result of the abuse.
- Lost wages and income — Time lost during disclosure, depositions, trial, or due to lasting trauma responses that impair consistent employment.
- Lost earning capacity — When abuse causes long-term psychological impairment that reduces a survivor’s ability to work at full capacity.
Non-Economic Damages and the Diocesan Claims Process
California places no cap on non-economic damages in sexual abuse civil cases outside of bankruptcy. When a diocese has filed for Chapter 11 protection — as several California dioceses have in response to the volume of AB 2777 claims — survivors file proofs of claim through a court-supervised process instead of an individual jury trial. A survivor’s attorney remains essential in this process to document the severity of the abuse, its lasting impact, and the institution’s pattern of prior knowledge, all of which directly affect the claim’s valuation within the settlement trust.
AB 218 and AB 2777: California’s Expanded Recovery Windows
AB 218 (2019) eliminated the statute of limitations entirely for civil claims involving childhood sexual abuse — the majority of clergy abuse claims, since most documented clergy abuse involved child victims. There is no filing deadline.
AB 2777 (2022) created a limited revival window for adult survivors. This revival window closes permanently on December 31, 2026. Survivors who have not yet spoken with an attorney are working against a hard statutory deadline, and against the practical reality that diocesan bankruptcy claims deadlines can close even sooner than the statutory window.
How Compass Law Group Builds and Maximizes Case Value
“Clergy abuse cases often require us to prove a decades-long pattern of reassignment and cover-up that the diocese never wanted documented,” says a Compass Law Group senior attorney. “We investigate personnel files, secret archive records, and prior settlements to establish exactly what the diocese knew and when.”
Our case valuation methodology reflects more than $250 million in California recoveries and includes the following:
- Full diocesan personnel record review — We pursue clergy personnel files, prior complaint records, and reassignment histories through litigation discovery or the bankruptcy claims process.
- Forensic expert retention at intake — We retain psychiatric experts and forensic economists before the first demand or claim is filed.
- Institutional investigation — We identify every parish, school, and diocesan program where the abuser had access to children, often revealing additional survivors and additional evidence of institutional knowledge.
- Bankruptcy claims expertise — When a diocese has filed for Chapter 11, we file proofs of claim, participate in the survivor committee process, and advocate for maximum trust distribution on your behalf.
- Punitive damages analysis from day one — Where applicable outside of bankruptcy, we build the punitive damages case in parallel with compensatory damages from the moment of intake.
If you were abused by a priest, pastor, or any religious leader in California, you are entitled to a full, confidential accounting of what your case may be worth and what California law allows you to recover. The AB 2777 revival window closes December 31, 2026. Contact our San Francisco office today for a free, confidential consultation.
What to Do If You Are a Survivor of Clergy Sexual Abuse
Coming forward about clergy sexual abuse is uniquely difficult — survivors often carry decades of silence, fear of being disbelieved within their own faith community, or uncertainty about whether a claim is even still possible after so many years. California law gives survivors specific, powerful legal tools, and a civil claim is entirely separate from any internal church review or diocesan apology. The steps below are written for exactly this situation — including survivors coming forward decades after the abuse occurred.
- Write Down Everything You Remember — Memory is evidence, and in civil sexual abuse litigation it is among the most powerful evidence you have. Write a private, detailed account of every incident you can recall: the parish or program, the approximate dates, the clergy member’s name and title, what happened, and how you responded. Include any prior awareness you later learned the diocese had — such as the abuser being transferred to a new assignment.
- Gather Any Records You Have Access To — Baptism, confirmation, or enrollment records connecting you to the parish or program, photographs, letters, or any documentation showing your participation in youth ministry, altar service, or religious education during the relevant period can help establish the timeline and your access to the abuser.
- Understand That Reporting to the Church and Filing a Civil Claim Are Different Tracks — Reporting to a diocesan review board or victim assistance coordinator can trigger an internal review, but it does not compensate you financially and does not require the diocese to disclose what it knew. A civil claim is a separate legal track with its own discovery process, evidentiary standards, and right to compensation.
- Check Whether the Diocese Has Filed for Bankruptcy — Several California dioceses have filed for Chapter 11 protection in response to the volume of AB 2777 claims. If the diocese involved in your case has filed, there may be a claims-filing deadline separate from — and potentially earlier than — the general statutory deadline. An attorney can confirm which deadline applies to your situation and ensure you do not miss it.
- Contact a California Sexual Abuse Attorney Who Handles Clergy Abuse Cases — Civil claims against dioceses and religious organizations involve specialized procedure, particularly when a bankruptcy claims process is involved. An experienced attorney will evaluate what the diocese knew, pursue personnel and archive records, and ensure your claim is filed correctly and on time.
- Act Before the AB 2777 Revival Window Closes on December 31, 2026 — For survivors abused as children, AB 218 (2019) already eliminated the statute of limitations entirely — there is no deadline. For adult survivors, the AB 2777 revival window opened January 1, 2023, and closes permanently on December 31, 2026. Do not make assumptions about whether your case is time-barred, or whether a diocesan bankruptcy affects your ability to recover, without speaking to an attorney.
If you are ready to speak with a California sexual abuse attorney about a priest, pastor, or any religious leader who violated your trust, call our San Francisco office today at (213) 320-1001 for a free, completely confidential consultation — our team handles these cases with the sensitivity and legal precision they demand, and there is no fee unless we recover compensation for you.
Written & legally reviewed by Compass Law Group partners

Joseph Shirazi
Managing Partner, Compass Law Group, LLP
California State Bar #265403 · Loyola Law School, J.D.
Joseph Shirazi is the Managing Partner of Compass Law Group, LLP, leading the firm’s personal-injury, catastrophic-injury, and wrongful-death trial practice. He authored the analysis on this page.
Profiles: Avvo · Super Lawyers · Justia · LinkedIn · CA State Bar · Full Bio →

Simon Esfandi
Partner & Co-Founder, Compass Law Group, LLP
California State Bar #275307 · Loyola Law School, J.D.
Simon Esfandi is a Partner and Co-Founder of Compass Law Group, LLP. He reviewed this page for legal accuracy. Compass represents California sexual abuse survivors on a No Win, No Fee basis.
Profiles: Avvo · Super Lawyers · Justia · LinkedIn · CA State Bar · Full Bio →
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. This article is legal information, not legal advice.
Do I have a case?
Contact us today for a free consultation.
California's
Gold Standard
Injury Law Firm
With Joseph Shirazi and Simon Esfandi at the helm, our firm is a trusted name in accident law in California.
Meet Our Managing Partners
National Top 100 Trial Lawyers and Avvo 10.0 Superb. Loyola Law School graduate. Recognized for his $14,500,000 truck accident verdict and a $13,000,000 trial verdict.
Read Full Bio →
Super Lawyers Rising Star. Southwestern Law School graduate. Led the firm’s $9,870,000 motorcycle accident settlement and a $2,250,000 rideshare recovery.
Read Full Bio →- ★ National Top 100 Trial Lawyers
- ★ Super Lawyers Rising Star
- ★ Avvo 10.0 Superb Rating
- ★ Top 40 Under 40
- ★ Consumer Attorneys of California · CAALA · AAJ
Countless Real Client Reviews Verified by Google




Jerry
After 10 accidents and 9 attorneys, the client met Simon, who stood out for his honesty and clear communication. Years later, after another accident, the client called Simon and was impressed by his professionalism and follow-through. Simon explained everything, connected him with top doctors, and kept every promise. It was the first time the client felt truly supported—highly recommending Simon and Joseph for their integrity and dedication.
Jacob
Jacob was rear-ended by a big rig and left nearly paralyzed for a year. He found Compass Law Group, and Joseph and Simon personally helped him through the legal process. Over two years, they ensured he got the medical care and surgeries he needed, helped repair his car, and secured the compensation he deserved. He highly recommends them for truly fighting for their clients.
Blandine
During the early days of COVID, Blandine was hit by a car while biking to work. Alone and unsure of what to do, they found Compass Law Group. Joseph was the first to respond with care and clarity. Throughout the case, the team—Joseph, Simon, and Julie—provided support, regular check-ins, and made the client feel safe and cared for. They now consider the firm like family and highly recommend them for their compassion and competence.
Understanding Your Rights:
Frequently Asked
Questions
#1 Do I have a case?
Understanding whether a claim exists is one of the challenges of personal injury law. This is why we offer free initial consultations to help you make this determination and allow you an avenue to vindicate your rights.
We’re committed to fighting for the rights of accident victims throughout Southern California, and, unlike other California personal injury attorneys, we will take on any case if we can help, no matter how big or small.
#2 What is personal injury?
Personal injury involves harm to an individual’s body or property caused by someone else’s negligence. It can range from minor to significant injuries, often requiring legal action to recover damages. We specialize in representing and securing fair settlements for such victims.
#3 Why hire Compass Law Group?
Our client-focused approach ensures personalized attention, detailed case building, and compelling evidence presentation. We’re skilled in negotiating settlements and prepared for trial with aggressive strategies. Our firm maintains transparent communication, involves clients in the process, and utilizes a wide network of expert witnesses and resources to strengthen cases. Choosing us means trusting a team dedicated to your success and justice.
#4What if I didn't go to the hospital?
No matter the injury size, you have rights that need defending. Many injuries seem minor at first but can worsen over time. Ignoring treatment or legal advice risks your health and compensation. Seek immediate medical and legal help after any accident to ensure proper diagnosis and strengthen your compensation claim.