CALIFORNIA LEGAL CODE

California Civil Code § 51.9

Sexual Harassment in Professional Relationships

PUBLISHED · UPDATED

Under California Civil Code § 51.9, you can bring a civil claim for sexual harassment that occurs in a business, service, or professional relationship — such as with a doctor, therapist, attorney, landlord, teacher, or producer — even where there is no employer-employee relationship.

Reviewed against the current statutory text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. This page is legal information, not legal advice.

Exact Statute Text

51.9. (a) A person is liable… for sexual harassment… when the plaintiff proves all of the following: (1) There is a business, service, or professional relationship between the plaintiff and defendant… including… physician, psychotherapist, or dentist; attorney,… real estate agent,… accountant, banker,… landlord or property manager; teacher; elected official; lobbyist; director or producer; [or a substantially similar relationship].

(2) The defendant has made sexual advances, solicitations, sexual requests, demands for sexual compliance… or engaged in other verbal, visual, or physical conduct of a sexual nature or of a hostile nature based on gender, that were unwelcome and pervasive or severe.

Read the full, current section at the official source: Cal. Civ. Code § 51.9 (leginfo).

In Plain English

  • Beyond employment: covers harassment in professional/service relationships, not just employer-employee (which is FEHA).
  • Enumerated relationships: doctor, therapist, dentist, attorney, landlord, teacher, producer, and similar.
  • Standard: unwelcome sexual (or gender-based hostile) conduct that is pervasive or severe.
  • Civil remedy: allows a damages claim against the individual in that relationship.

Key Terms Defined

Business/service/professional relationship

A defined relationship — e.g., physician, attorney, landlord, teacher, producer — or one substantially similar.

Pervasive or severe

The threshold for actionable conduct: it must be more than an isolated trivial incident, or severe enough on its own.

Sexual harassment (§ 51.9)

Unwelcome sexual advances or gender-based hostile conduct within a covered non-employment relationship.

Purpose & Context

Section 51.9 fills the gap left by employment law: it lets people harassed by professionals or service providers they depend on — doctors, landlords, attorneys, and others — sue for that harassment directly.

Real-World Example

A patient is subjected to repeated unwelcome sexual advances by a treating physician. Because a physician-patient relationship is expressly covered and the conduct is pervasive, the patient may bring a § 51.9 claim against the doctor — distinct from any medical-board complaint.

Civil Code § 51.9 elements

Civil Code § 51.9 elements — Source: Cal. Civ. Code § 51.9 (leginfo).
ElementWhat must be shownSubdivision
RelationshipA covered business/service/professional relationship(a)(1)
ConductUnwelcome sexual or gender-based hostile conduct(a)(2)
SeverityPervasive or severe(a)(2)
Examples of defendantsDoctor, therapist, attorney, landlord, teacher, producer(a)(1)(A)–(I)

Why 51.9 Matters

For survivors & plaintiffs

If a professional you relied on harassed you — a doctor, landlord, or attorney — § 51.9 gives you a direct civil claim even without an employment relationship. See our California sexual abuse lawyer page.

For defendants & institutions

Professionals and service providers can be personally liable for harassment within these relationships, separate from licensing discipline.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can be sued under Civil Code § 51.9?

People in defined business, service, or professional relationships — including doctors, therapists, dentists, attorneys, landlords, teachers, and producers.

How is § 51.9 different from workplace harassment law?

FEHA covers employer-employee harassment; § 51.9 covers harassment in professional/service relationships outside ordinary employment.

What conduct qualifies?

Unwelcome sexual advances, requests, or gender-based hostile conduct that is pervasive or severe.

Do I need to prove a criminal act?

No — § 51.9 is a civil claim based on the harassment, not a crime.

Sources & Legal Authorities

Primary and government sources (verified). This page is legal information, not legal advice.

Joseph Shirazi, Managing Partner at Compass Law Group

Joseph Shirazi — Managing Partner · California State Bar #265403

Joseph Shirazi is the Managing Partner of Compass Law Group, LLP, representing injury and abuse survivors throughout California. He leads the firm’s litigation practice and has recovered substantial results for clients in serious injury and sexual abuse cases.

Verified profiles: Avvo · Super Lawyers · Justia · Elite Lawyer · LinkedIn · CA State Bar

Legally reviewed by Simon Esfandi, Partner & Co-Founder (CA Bar #275307).

Disclaimer: This page provides general legal information about California law and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Do I have a case?

Contact us today for a free consultation.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

California's
Gold Standard
Injury Law Firm

With Joseph Shirazi and Simon Esfandi at the helm, our firm is a trusted name in accident law in California.

Meet Our Managing Partners

Joseph Shirazi
Managing Partner · CA Bar #265403

National Top 100 Trial Lawyers and Avvo 10.0 Superb. Loyola Law School graduate. Recognized for his $14,500,000 truck accident verdict and a $13,000,000 trial verdict.

Read Full Bio →
Simon Esfandi — Managing Partner
Simon Esfandi
Managing Partner · CA Bar #275307

Super Lawyers Rising Star. Southwestern Law School graduate. Led the firm’s $9,870,000 motorcycle accident settlement and a $2,250,000 rideshare recovery.

Read Full Bio →
Firm Recognition
  • ★ National Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • ★ Super Lawyers Rising Star
  • ★ Avvo 10.0 Superb Rating
  • ★ Top 40 Under 40
  • ★ Consumer Attorneys of California · CAALA · AAJ
Total Recovered for Clients
$250,000,000+
$14.5M truck verdict · $13M trial verdict · $9.87M motorcycle · $5M car accident
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique.
Client Rating
★★★★★ 5.0
193+ verified Google reviews · No win, no fee