CALIFORNIA LEGAL CODE

California Penal Code § 261

Rape (and the Civil Claim It Supports)

PUBLISHED · UPDATED

Under California Penal Code § 261, California Penal Code § 261 defines rape as an act of sexual intercourse accomplished without legal consent — including where the victim is incapable of consenting or where force, threat, or fraud is used. The same conduct can also support a civil lawsuit for damages, independent of any criminal case.

Reviewed against the current statutory text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. This page is legal information, not legal advice.

Exact Statute Text

261. (a) Rape is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished… under any of the following circumstances: (1) If a person is at the time incapable, because of a mental disorder or developmental or physical disability, of giving legal consent… [and by force, duress, menace, or fear; where the victim is unconscious or intoxicated; or where consent is obtained by fraud, as further specified in the statute].

Read the full, current section at the official source: Cal. Penal Code § 261 (leginfo).

In Plain English

  • Criminal definition: § 261 sets out the circumstances that make sexual intercourse rape under California law.
  • Civil parallel: the same act can ground a civil claim for damages — a criminal conviction is not required to sue.
  • Referenced for civil deadlines: § 261 is among the offenses that define “sexual assault” for the civil statute of limitations in CCP § 340.16.
  • Lower civil burden: a civil claim is proved by a preponderance of the evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt.

Key Terms Defined

Rape (Penal Code § 261)

Non-consensual sexual intercourse accomplished under the circumstances listed in the statute.

Legal consent

Freely and knowingly given agreement; a person incapacitated by disability, unconsciousness, or intoxication cannot legally consent.

Civil claim

A separate lawsuit for money damages based on the same conduct, independent of the criminal case.

Purpose & Context

Section 261 is the criminal definition of rape. For survivors, it also matters civilly: it identifies the conduct that supports a civil claim and helps define the deadlines under California’s civil sexual-assault statutes.

Real-World Example

A person is sexually assaulted while too intoxicated to consent. Even if prosecutors never bring criminal charges under § 261, the survivor may pursue a civil claim for damages under California’s civil statutes, which use a lower burden of proof.

Penal § 261 — criminal vs. civil

Penal § 261 — criminal vs. civil — Source: Cal. Penal Code § 261; Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.16; Evid. Code § 115.
Criminal (§ 261)Civil claim
Who brings itDistrict AttorneyThe survivor
Burden of proofBeyond a reasonable doubtPreponderance of the evidence
Conviction required to sue?No
DeadlineSet by criminal lawCCP § 340.16 (adult) / § 340.1 (child)

Why 261 Matters

For injured people & families

You do not need a criminal conviction to hold an assailant accountable — the same conduct defined in § 261 can support a civil claim for compensation. See our California sexual abuse lawyer page.

For defendants

Civil exposure exists independently of the criminal outcome, and is decided under the lower preponderance standard.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue for rape if there was no criminal conviction?

Yes. A civil claim is separate from the criminal case and does not require a conviction under Penal Code § 261.

What is the civil deadline?

For adult survivors, generally CCP § 340.16 (the later of 10 years or 3 years from discovery); for childhood abuse, CCP § 340.1 (no time limit).

What is the burden of proof in the civil case?

A preponderance of the evidence — lower than the criminal ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ standard.

Does intoxication affect consent?

A person too intoxicated to understand or resist cannot give legal consent under California law.

Sources & Legal Authorities

Joseph Shirazi, Managing Partner at Compass Law Group

Joseph Shirazi — Managing Partner · California State Bar #265403

Joseph Shirazi is the Managing Partner of Compass Law Group, LLP, representing injury and abuse survivors throughout California.

Verified profiles: Avvo · Super Lawyers · Justia · Elite Lawyer · LinkedIn · CA State Bar

Legally reviewed by Simon Esfandi, Partner & Co-Founder (CA Bar #275307).

Disclaimer: This page provides general legal information about California law and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Do I have a case?

Contact us today for a free consultation.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

California's
Gold Standard
Injury Law Firm

With Joseph Shirazi and Simon Esfandi at the helm, our firm is a trusted name in accident law in California.

Meet Our Managing Partners

Joseph Shirazi
Managing Partner · CA Bar #265403

National Top 100 Trial Lawyers and Avvo 10.0 Superb. Loyola Law School graduate. Recognized for his $14,500,000 truck accident verdict and a $13,000,000 trial verdict.

Read Full Bio →
Simon Esfandi — Managing Partner
Simon Esfandi
Managing Partner · CA Bar #275307

Super Lawyers Rising Star. Southwestern Law School graduate. Led the firm’s $9,870,000 motorcycle accident settlement and a $2,250,000 rideshare recovery.

Read Full Bio →
Firm Recognition
  • ★ National Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • ★ Super Lawyers Rising Star
  • ★ Avvo 10.0 Superb Rating
  • ★ Top 40 Under 40
  • ★ Consumer Attorneys of California · CAALA · AAJ
Total Recovered for Clients
$250,000,000+
$14.5M truck verdict · $13M trial verdict · $9.87M motorcycle · $5M car accident
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique.
Client Rating
★★★★★ 5.0
193+ verified Google reviews · No win, no fee