CALIFORNIA LEGAL CODE

California Penal Code § 289

Forcible Sexual Penetration (and Civil Claims)

PUBLISHED · UPDATED

Under California Penal Code § 289, California Penal Code § 289 criminalizes sexual penetration accomplished against the victim’s will by force, duress, or fear, or on a victim who cannot consent. Section 289 offenses are among those that support civil claims under CCP § 340.1 (childhood) and § 340.16 (adult).

Reviewed against the current statutory text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. This page is legal information, not legal advice.

Exact Statute Text

289. (a)(1)(A) Any person who commits an act of sexual penetration when the act is accomplished against the victim’s will by means of force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the victim or another person shall be punished by imprisonment…

(a)(1)(B) Any person who commits an act of sexual penetration upon a child who is under 14 years of age… against the victim’s will by means of force… shall be punished by imprisonment…

Read the full, current section at the official source: Cal. Penal Code § 289 (leginfo).

In Plain English

  • Criminal definition: § 289 covers forcible sexual penetration, with enhanced penalties where the victim is a child.
  • Civil parallel: § 289 offenses are among those defining sexual assault/abuse for civil claims.
  • Deadlines: childhood claims have no deadline (§ 340.1); adult claims follow § 340.16.
  • No conviction required to bring the civil claim.

Key Terms Defined

Sexual penetration

Non-consensual penetration as defined in § 289, accomplished by force, duress, or on a victim who cannot consent.

Against the victim’s will

Without consent — a required element of a § 289 forcible offense.

Civil sexual assault

The civil-law category incorporating § 289 offenses, with deadlines under § 340.1 / § 340.16.

Purpose & Context

Section 289 is the criminal statute for forcible sexual penetration. It also matters civilly: § 289 offenses are among those that define sexual assault and abuse for California’s civil statutes, enabling survivors to seek compensation.

Real-World Example

A survivor of a § 289 assault chooses not to pursue criminal charges. They may still bring a civil claim — within § 340.16’s window for adults, or with no deadline under § 340.1 if the abuse occurred in childhood.

Penal § 289 — civil takeaways

Penal § 289 — civil takeaways — Source: Cal. Penal Code § 289; CCP §§ 340.1, 340.16.
ItemRule
CriminalForcible sexual penetration (enhanced for children)
Civil categorySupports sexual assault/abuse civil claims
Childhood deadlineNone (§ 340.1)
Adult deadlineLater of 10 yrs or 3 yrs from discovery (§ 340.16)

Why 289 Matters

For injured people & families

Whether the assault happened in childhood or adulthood, § 289 conduct supports a civil claim — and childhood claims have no deadline at all. See our California sexual abuse lawyer page.

For defendants

Civil liability for § 289 conduct exists independently of the criminal case and, for childhood abuse, without any limitations period.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue for a § 289 sexual assault without criminal charges?

Yes. A civil claim is independent of the criminal case and does not require a conviction.

What is the civil deadline?

Childhood abuse: none (CCP § 340.1). Adult assault: the later of 10 years or 3 years from discovery (CCP § 340.16).

Can I sue an institution?

Yes, where its negligence enabled the assault; childhood cover-ups can trigger treble damages under § 340.1.

What is the burden of proof?

A preponderance of the evidence in the civil case, lower than the criminal standard.

Sources & Legal Authorities

Joseph Shirazi, Managing Partner at Compass Law Group

Joseph Shirazi — Managing Partner · California State Bar #265403

Joseph Shirazi is the Managing Partner of Compass Law Group, LLP, representing injury and abuse survivors throughout California.

Verified profiles: Avvo · Super Lawyers · Justia · Elite Lawyer · LinkedIn · CA State Bar

Legally reviewed by Simon Esfandi, Partner & Co-Founder (CA Bar #275307).

Disclaimer: This page provides general legal information about California law and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Do I have a case?

Contact us today for a free consultation.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

California's
Gold Standard
Injury Law Firm

With Joseph Shirazi and Simon Esfandi at the helm, our firm is a trusted name in accident law in California.

Meet Our Managing Partners

Joseph Shirazi
Managing Partner · CA Bar #265403

National Top 100 Trial Lawyers and Avvo 10.0 Superb. Loyola Law School graduate. Recognized for his $14,500,000 truck accident verdict and a $13,000,000 trial verdict.

Read Full Bio →
Simon Esfandi — Managing Partner
Simon Esfandi
Managing Partner · CA Bar #275307

Super Lawyers Rising Star. Southwestern Law School graduate. Led the firm’s $9,870,000 motorcycle accident settlement and a $2,250,000 rideshare recovery.

Read Full Bio →
Firm Recognition
  • ★ National Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • ★ Super Lawyers Rising Star
  • ★ Avvo 10.0 Superb Rating
  • ★ Top 40 Under 40
  • ★ Consumer Attorneys of California · CAALA · AAJ
Total Recovered for Clients
$250,000,000+
$14.5M truck verdict · $13M trial verdict · $9.87M motorcycle · $5M car accident
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique.
Client Rating
★★★★★ 5.0
193+ verified Google reviews · No win, no fee