CALIFORNIA LEGAL CODE

California Penal Code § 288

Lewd Acts on a Child (and Civil Claims)

PUBLISHED · UPDATED

Under California Penal Code § 288, California Penal Code § 288 makes it a felony to commit a lewd or lascivious act on a child under 14. Acts under § 288 are among the offenses that define “childhood sexual assault” for civil claims under CCP § 340.1 — which has no filing deadline.

Reviewed against the current statutory text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. This page is legal information, not legal advice.

Exact Statute Text

288. (a)… a person who willfully and lewdly commits any lewd or lascivious act… upon or with the body… of a child who is under the age of 14 years, with the intent of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying the lust, passions, or sexual desires of that person or the child, is guilty of a felony…

(b)(1) A person who commits an act described in subdivision (a) by use of force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury… is guilty of a felony…

Read the full, current section at the official source: Cal. Penal Code § 288 (leginfo).

In Plain English

  • Criminal definition: § 288 covers lewd or lascivious acts on a child under 14; force or duress increases the penalty.
  • Civil connection: § 288 acts are expressly among the offenses defining “childhood sexual assault” in CCP § 340.1(c).
  • No civil deadline: childhood-abuse civil claims under § 340.1 have no statute of limitations.
  • Institutions included: survivors can pursue civil claims against enabling institutions, not just the abuser.

Key Terms Defined

Lewd or lascivious act

A sexual touching of a child done with the intent of sexual gratification, as defined in § 288.

Childhood sexual assault

The civil-law category (CCP § 340.1(c)) that incorporates § 288 acts and carries no filing deadline.

Duress

Coercion by threat or pressure — an aggravating circumstance under § 288(b).

Purpose & Context

Section 288 is the criminal statute protecting children from sexual abuse. It also anchors civil accountability: because § 340.1 incorporates § 288 acts and imposes no deadline, adult survivors of childhood abuse can still sue the abuser and enabling institutions.

Real-World Example

An adult realizes years later that abuse they suffered as a child would have violated § 288. Because CCP § 340.1 has no time limit for childhood sexual assault, they can still bring a civil claim — and a proven cover-up can trigger treble damages.

Penal § 288 — civil takeaways

Penal § 288 — civil takeaways — Source: Cal. Penal Code § 288; Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.1.
ItemRule
CriminalFelony — lewd act on a child under 14
Civil categoryDefines ‘childhood sexual assault’ (§ 340.1(c))
Civil deadlineNone (§ 340.1)
Cover-upUp to treble damages (§ 340.1(b))

Why 288 Matters

For injured people & families

Because § 340.1 has no deadline, survivors of § 288 childhood abuse can seek justice decades later — against the abuser and the institution that enabled it. See our California child sexual abuse lawyer page.

For defendants

Institutions face open-ended civil exposure — and treble damages for cover-ups — for childhood abuse involving § 288 conduct.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue for childhood abuse that would violate Penal Code § 288?

Yes. Section 288 acts define childhood sexual assault under CCP § 340.1, which has no civil filing deadline.

Is there a deadline to file?

No. Childhood sexual abuse civil claims have no statute of limitations under CCP § 340.1.

Can I sue a school or organization?

Yes, where its negligence enabled the abuse — and a proven cover-up can trigger treble damages.

Do I need a criminal conviction?

No. A civil claim is independent of any criminal case under § 288.

Sources & Legal Authorities

Joseph Shirazi, Managing Partner at Compass Law Group

Joseph Shirazi — Managing Partner · California State Bar #265403

Joseph Shirazi is the Managing Partner of Compass Law Group, LLP, representing injury and abuse survivors throughout California.

Verified profiles: Avvo · Super Lawyers · Justia · Elite Lawyer · LinkedIn · CA State Bar

Legally reviewed by Simon Esfandi, Partner & Co-Founder (CA Bar #275307).

Disclaimer: This page provides general legal information about California law and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Do I have a case?

Contact us today for a free consultation.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

California's
Gold Standard
Injury Law Firm

With Joseph Shirazi and Simon Esfandi at the helm, our firm is a trusted name in accident law in California.

Meet Our Managing Partners

Joseph Shirazi
Managing Partner · CA Bar #265403

National Top 100 Trial Lawyers and Avvo 10.0 Superb. Loyola Law School graduate. Recognized for his $14,500,000 truck accident verdict and a $13,000,000 trial verdict.

Read Full Bio →
Simon Esfandi — Managing Partner
Simon Esfandi
Managing Partner · CA Bar #275307

Super Lawyers Rising Star. Southwestern Law School graduate. Led the firm’s $9,870,000 motorcycle accident settlement and a $2,250,000 rideshare recovery.

Read Full Bio →
Firm Recognition
  • ★ National Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • ★ Super Lawyers Rising Star
  • ★ Avvo 10.0 Superb Rating
  • ★ Top 40 Under 40
  • ★ Consumer Attorneys of California · CAALA · AAJ
Total Recovered for Clients
$250,000,000+
$14.5M truck verdict · $13M trial verdict · $9.87M motorcycle · $5M car accident
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique.
Client Rating
★★★★★ 5.0
193+ verified Google reviews · No win, no fee